The next ‘course’ is the first chapter
entirely dedicated to a single economist- Adam Smith, the ‘Father of modern
Economics’ (To avoid confusion, here, I shall refer to both David and Adam
Smith by their first names). The chapter begins with a brief history of Adam’s
life with aspects of his childhood upbringing with regards to his teachers and
mentors being mentioned. Aside from this, the focus of this chapter is on
Adam’s writing career and gradual rise to fame as ‘The Father of Economics’.
Where he lacked in looks, he more than made up for in writing ability- Adam is
most famous for his two books an Inquiry
into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments. The
latter of the two outsold Wealth of Nations by far, despite it not being
nearly as important in the eyes of many. In Wealth
of Nations, Adam used his experiences of travelling the world, meeting the
likes of Voltaire and Quesnay, to present “The
first synthesis of economics in its entirety.” It explained many of the
phenomenon that have laid the foundations for much of econometrics (macro and
micro) in that it began discussions on specialisation,
absolute advantage, and free trade. It also gave birth to one of the most
famous examples of the division of labour and specialisation that helped shape
the construction industry, and put Adam on the £20 note- the pin factory. He
cites the example of a pin factory in which workers make the pin in its
entirety from start to finish, and could produce a fair number, but if each
individual worker were to SPECIALISE in a specific task related to the
production process, they could increase their output by somewhere between 240
and 4800 times. This revolutionary idea laid the foundations upon which the
likes of Henry T. Ford built when he invented the moving production line for
the ‘T-model’ Ford in 1912. After this, David speaks of ‘The Invisible Hand’ which, although only being referred to once in
The Wealth of Nations, is one of the most famous pieces of writing
Smith ever produced. This was the ‘Invisible Hand’ of the market, which helped
keep the markets from failing- Adam also speaks of ‘liberty’ and that without
it; the ‘Invisible Hand’ cannot operate properly. This is one of the main
arguments for right-winged anarchists or just those who look on at the ‘laissez-faire’ government from the ‘Republican Ascendency’ days with
nostalgia.
Once again, if you have any questions about key terms, or references to individuals that I've made, feel free to ask in the comments section below.
K
No comments:
Post a Comment